Category talk:Bristol 170 Freighter

Page Creation

Thanks to Sixcyl for creating the page content. Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 10:39, 14 February 2011 (MST)

Thank's Tim. My first page of that kind. I understand why you could hardly afford doing all the job alone, matter of time because it's amazing quite long, as much as, or even more long than editing a film page! By the way,I did intentionnally named the category Bristol Freighter and not 170 Freighter,because I thought it was better generic name due to existence of other types (179, 216)...just a convention, but in such a way I would have prefered Bristol 170 Freighter because I don't find these "type" or "model" inclusions very atractive and good looking for naming aircrafts... some litteratures use them, some don't. Couldn't we agree on this? Sixcyl 15:10, 14 February 2011 (MST)

Good point. Not a problem, I understand what you mean so have recreated the page. Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 11:49, 20 February 2011 (MST)

Why there's no section "edit" anymore on this page?? Sixcyl 07:41, 20 February 2011 (MST)

I don't know why on this one, but we are now fully protecting (administrators only) all 'Category' pages. Any suggestions for changes can be made on the discussion pages. Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 11:49, 20 February 2011 (MST)

Thank's for the move. By the way the edit section is operating again. fine! Sixcyl 12:37, 20 February 2011 (MST)