Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tomorrow Never Dies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→F-15) |
m (→F-15) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Good eye ford_guy! [[User:Tleeg|Tleeg]] 16:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | :::Good eye ford_guy! [[User:Tleeg|Tleeg]] 16:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Thanks guys. I didn't want to edit the page because I was just trying to be a bit courteous, but I'm glad to know it can be done. [[User:ford_guy|ford_guy]] 22:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::Thanks guys. I didn't want to edit the page because I was just trying to be a bit courteous, but I'm glad to know it can be done. [[User:ford_guy|ford_guy]] 22:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Chinese MiGs, the only single-engined MiG that they are likely to be is the MiG-23/MiG-27. Do you think they look enough like them to list them as that? - [[User:G-MANN|G-MANN]] | ||
Revision as of 14:26, 10 June 2010
F-15
G-MANN, as I mentioned to you on IMCDb, the F-15 is a Strike Eagle, not simply an Eagle as the two models have different paint jobs. -ford_guy
- If you are certain about that ford_guy, feel free to update the page. Tleeg 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Concur that it's a strike eagle. Paint job can vary but most significantly these F-15's are two-seater (strike) and have Conformal Fuel tanks next to the engine intakes. Bthebest 15:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The Chinese MiGs, the only single-engined MiG that they are likely to be is the MiG-23/MiG-27. Do you think they look enough like them to list them as that? - G-MANN