Difference between revisions of "Talk:Valkyrie"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
According to the IPMDb rules that we must follow to reach a better homogenity:<br> | According to the IPMDb rules that we must follow to reach a better homogenity:<br> | ||
1- Director mention is not required .(I agree this should be a good information for the page...)<br> | 1- Director mention is not required .(I agree this should be a good information for the page...)<br> | ||
| − | 2- Designation aircraft must be the closest to the type described on the picture, for instance Junkers Ju-52 is a Ju-52/3mg4e.<br> | + | 2- Designation aircraft must be the closest to the type described on the picture, for instance Junkers Ju-52 is a Ju-52/3mg4e. And the P-40E is a Kittyhawk not Warhawk according to reliable website [http://www.aeromovies.fr/articles.php?lng=en&pg=1138 Aeromovies] <br> |
3- Don't forget the category list for aircraft that are put on the page when they are listed as category, so they will appear in the category aircraft page (don't know why you've deleted this addition from myself?)<br> | 3- Don't forget the category list for aircraft that are put on the page when they are listed as category, so they will appear in the category aircraft page (don't know why you've deleted this addition from myself?)<br> | ||
4- According to the rules, only 5 (or 6 exceptionnally) pictures by aircraft are permitted. But same aircraft type can be shared in several parts since they are different registration samples. What I've donne for the Junkers (2 different aircraft, though from same type). It remains too much pictures for HB-HOT/D-2600 by the way. <br> | 4- According to the rules, only 5 (or 6 exceptionnally) pictures by aircraft are permitted. But same aircraft type can be shared in several parts since they are different registration samples. What I've donne for the Junkers (2 different aircraft, though from same type). It remains too much pictures for HB-HOT/D-2600 by the way. <br> | ||
Thanks.<br> | Thanks.<br> | ||
[[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 01:07, 19 November 2012 (MST) | [[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 01:07, 19 November 2012 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi Sixcy | ||
| + | Thank you for your helpful comments and your modifications. I rather appreciate it when many of us shape the final page. Btw I did'nt delete your addition, or if I did, it was by mistake. | ||
| + | Sheers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You're wellcome. Thanks![[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 23:49, 19 November 2012 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 20 November 2012
Contribution
Many thanks for this nice contribution DWR!
As you're new on the site, I've permitted myself some modifications on this page, that I have to comment for your info.
According to the IPMDb rules that we must follow to reach a better homogenity:
1- Director mention is not required .(I agree this should be a good information for the page...)
2- Designation aircraft must be the closest to the type described on the picture, for instance Junkers Ju-52 is a Ju-52/3mg4e. And the P-40E is a Kittyhawk not Warhawk according to reliable website Aeromovies
3- Don't forget the category list for aircraft that are put on the page when they are listed as category, so they will appear in the category aircraft page (don't know why you've deleted this addition from myself?)
4- According to the rules, only 5 (or 6 exceptionnally) pictures by aircraft are permitted. But same aircraft type can be shared in several parts since they are different registration samples. What I've donne for the Junkers (2 different aircraft, though from same type). It remains too much pictures for HB-HOT/D-2600 by the way.
Thanks.
Sixcyl 01:07, 19 November 2012 (MST)
Hi Sixcy Thank you for your helpful comments and your modifications. I rather appreciate it when many of us shape the final page. Btw I did'nt delete your addition, or if I did, it was by mistake. Sheers.
You're wellcome. Thanks!Sixcyl 23:49, 19 November 2012 (MST)