Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Canadair CL-215"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Why is there a category for this one, as it doesn't match with the rule of 2 aircraft/Category? Any way I would personnally prefer to have a category starting at 1 aircraft. It s…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Single Plane Categories == | ||
Why is there a category for this one, as it doesn't match with the rule of 2 aircraft/Category? | Why is there a category for this one, as it doesn't match with the rule of 2 aircraft/Category? | ||
| − | Any way I would personnally prefer to have a category starting at 1 aircraft. It seems that it would be easier for the future to keep chance of a proper regroupment when a second aircraft similar comes in new pages. By the way I'm working of an | + | Any way I would personnally prefer to have a category starting at 1 aircraft. It seems that it would be easier for the future to keep chance of a proper regroupment when a second aircraft similar comes in new pages. By the way I'm working of an exhaustive list of all the new airplanes I have found since I fill the base. I will come soon with the result. Already, there are some aircrafts that should deserve there category according to this rule:<br> |
| − | Douglas DC-7 | + | Douglas DC-7<br> |
| − | Junkers Ju-52 | + | Junkers Ju-52<br> |
| − | De Havilland Comet | + | De Havilland Comet<br> |
| − | Sopwith Camel...etc | + | Sopwith Camel...etc<br> |
| − | |||
[[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] | [[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] | ||
| + | :Our main admin Tim is busy this week, but I am sure he had a good reason to create this page with only one plane in the category. I assume he wasn't finished with it (adding to it) or something. I have noticed that there are a couple that are ready for category pages (2 or more) like the Ju-52. For those, feel free to create the category if you can keep to the same format which has been used. Regarding single plane categories, lets wait to hear more opinions, or at least when Tim gets back. It may be as simple as a lot of extra work (creating categories when there is only one plane to include). Also, I was curious what you meant by this, "''By the way I'm working of an exhaustive list of all the new airplanes <u>I have found since I fill the base.</u>''" | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 8 December 2010
Single Plane Categories
Why is there a category for this one, as it doesn't match with the rule of 2 aircraft/Category?
Any way I would personnally prefer to have a category starting at 1 aircraft. It seems that it would be easier for the future to keep chance of a proper regroupment when a second aircraft similar comes in new pages. By the way I'm working of an exhaustive list of all the new airplanes I have found since I fill the base. I will come soon with the result. Already, there are some aircrafts that should deserve there category according to this rule:
Douglas DC-7
Junkers Ju-52
De Havilland Comet
Sopwith Camel...etc
Sixcyl
- Our main admin Tim is busy this week, but I am sure he had a good reason to create this page with only one plane in the category. I assume he wasn't finished with it (adding to it) or something. I have noticed that there are a couple that are ready for category pages (2 or more) like the Ju-52. For those, feel free to create the category if you can keep to the same format which has been used. Regarding single plane categories, lets wait to hear more opinions, or at least when Tim gets back. It may be as simple as a lot of extra work (creating categories when there is only one plane to include). Also, I was curious what you meant by this, "By the way I'm working of an exhaustive list of all the new airplanes I have found since I fill the base."