Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Boeing 747SP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Eh, I figured since it has its own page on Wikipedia, we might as well have one here. Plus I thought it was different enough from the mainline 747 variants to warrant a separate page. If you think it's unnecessary, I'm fine with it being removed. [[User:Corkeyandpals|Corkeyandpals]] 12:55, 6 March 2015 (MST) | : Eh, I figured since it has its own page on Wikipedia, we might as well have one here. Plus I thought it was different enough from the mainline 747 variants to warrant a separate page. If you think it's unnecessary, I'm fine with it being removed. [[User:Corkeyandpals|Corkeyandpals]] 12:55, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm quite agreeing with Bthebest, since the aircraft shares the same 747 name, though its differences from the original aircraft. It can't be compared with DC-4 and DC-4E which are actually very different airplanes. Well ...I'm 50/50 thinking on this case.[[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 13:06, 6 March 2015 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 6 March 2015
Separate Category
What's the justification for a separate category for the SP variant? It's still a 747 and you could argue any other variant of the 747 deserves a category? Bthebest - IMPDb Administrator 12:38, 6 March 2015 (MST)
- Eh, I figured since it has its own page on Wikipedia, we might as well have one here. Plus I thought it was different enough from the mainline 747 variants to warrant a separate page. If you think it's unnecessary, I'm fine with it being removed. Corkeyandpals 12:55, 6 March 2015 (MST)
I'm quite agreeing with Bthebest, since the aircraft shares the same 747 name, though its differences from the original aircraft. It can't be compared with DC-4 and DC-4E which are actually very different airplanes. Well ...I'm 50/50 thinking on this case.Sixcyl 13:06, 6 March 2015 (MST)